Manual Therapy by General Medical Practitioners for Nonspecific Low Back Pain in Primary Care: The ManRück Study Protocol of a Clinical Trial
Introduction
Acute low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem accounting for frequent general medical practitioner (GP) consultations. Although spontaneous healing is the norm for nonspecific LBP,1 the disease is costly because of the high number of visits to GPs and specialists and the sick leave incurred. Quality of life during the painful episode is poor, and there is a high risk that a chronic illness will develop.2, 3
The National Treatment Guidelines recommend maintaining physical activity and taking painkillers (ie, nonsteroidal antirheumatics as evidence-based therapeutic options).4 Manual therapy (MT) is another therapeutic option, although its effectiveness for acute LBP remains controversial. Although a systematic review from 2012 concluded that the addition of MT offers no benefit,5 more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated positive effects of MT on pain and physical function.6, 7 International guidelines differ in their recommendations regarding MT; whereas some are in favor, others strongly advise against its use.8
In Germany, MT is taught using several different approaches and techniques and is considered to be highly beneficial by more than 80% of GPs.9 More than 20 000 medical physicians, many of whom are GPs, have received training in MT from 1 of the 5 different schools.10 In Germany, MT is frequently administered in the general practice setting, an approach that has also proven feasible in other countries.11, 12 In contrast to studies on MT where the treatment is mainly performed by chiropractors, manual therapists, and osteopaths,5 the ManRück study (Manuelle Therapie bei unspezifischen akuten Rückenschmerzen) addresses the effects of MT provided by medical GPs. Studies focusing on provision of MT by a GP during a clinical appointment are scarce. In addition, the number of GPs already certified to administer MT is very low compared to the prevalence of LBP. As a positive effect of MT on acute LBP seems likely, we set out to determine whether training in MT for acute LBP can improve outcomes in primary care patients treated by GPs who are otherwise inexperienced in MT. Therefore, the objective of this article is to describe the protocol of a study that will measure whether MT provided by general practitioners leads to a faster pain reduction in patients with nonspecific LBP than does standard care.
Section snippets
Study Overview
The study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, pre-/postintervention study to evaluate the benefits of GPs’ training in MT for patients with acute LBP. Participating GPs who are not trained in MT will consecutively recruit all patients with LBP who fulfill the inclusion criteria. In the preintervention (control) section of the study, the GPs will provide standard treatment for their patients according to the national guidelines. After receiving an expert-approved training in MT for acute
Discussion
This article outlines the rationale and design for a controlled pre-/postintervention study into the use of MT in primary care to treat acute LBP. The lack of clarity regarding the impact of MT on acute, nonspecific LBP8, 15, 16 and the scarcity of trials focusing on the GPs who frequently face patients suffering from LBP motivated us to design this trial. In the ManRück trial, we will explore the effectiveness of standardized MT administered by GPs who have received expert-approved MT training
Conclusion
We describe an intervention for patients with LBP using an expert-approved set of MT techniques. This study seeks to determine whether this intervention can substantially improve the care of patients with acute nonspecific LBP. If successful, this would expand the therapeutic options for patients with acute LBP in primary care.
Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest
The study was enabled by an unrestricted grant from the Rut and Klaus Bahlsen Stiftung, Hannover, Germany. The funding organization has no influence on the manner in which the study is conducted or on the publication process. CS is a trainer in MT and offers courses. All other authors report no conflicts of interests.
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the participating physicians, staff and patients. Special thanks to the other participants in the expert meeting (Prof Jean Chenot, Dr.med. Andreas Oser).
References (22)
- et al.
NASS contemporary concepts in spine care: spinal manipulation therapy for acute low back pain
Spine J
(2010) - et al.
"You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain
Eur J Pain
(2007) - et al.
A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the united states and internationally
Spine J
(2008) - et al.
Does clinician treatment choice improve the outcomes of manual therapy for nonspecific low back pain? A metaanalysis
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2005) - et al.
Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care
Eur Spine J
(2006) - et al.
Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study
BMJ
(2008) - et al.
Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study
BMJ
(1998) - et al.
National disease management guideline. ‘Low back pain’—short version
- et al.
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2012) - et al.
Spinal high-velocity low amplitude manipulation in acute nonspecific low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in comparison with diclofenac and placebo
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2013)
Adding chiropractic manipulative therapy to standard medical care for patients with acute low back pain: results of a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Cited by (2)
Psychological context effects of participant expectation on pain pressure thresholds as an adjunct to cervicothoracic HVLA thrust manipulation: A randomised controlled trial
2020, International Journal of Osteopathic MedicineCitation Excerpt :Chronic pain can be defined as pain which is not resolved during the normal period of tissue healing time [1], with symptoms lasting a minimum of 3 months [2]. During an episode of pain, quality of life can be dramatically reduced and the ability to carry out daily tasks is limited [3]. The epidemiological evidence suggests that the most common cause of disability worldwide is chronic pain [4].
Manual therapy applied by general practitioners for nonspecific low back pain: Results of the ManRück pilot-study
2018, Chiropractic and Manual Therapies