Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 95-96 , June 2010

The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature

Received 6 January 2010 ,Revised 28 January 2010 ,Accepted 3 February 2010.

References 

  1. Cooperstein R, Lew M. The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2009;8(3):107–118
  2. Rhodes DW, Mansfield ER, Bishop PA, Smith JF. The validity of the prone leg check as an estimate of standing leg length inequality measured by X-ray. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18(6):343–346
  3. Mannello DM. Leg length inequality. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15(9):576–590
  4. Friberg O, Koivisto E, Wegelius C. A radiographic method for measurement of leg length inequality. Diagn Imag Clin Med. 1985;54:78–81
  5. Knutson GA. Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005;13(1):11

PII: S1556-3707(10)00038-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.02.006

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 95-96 , June 2010

Article Tools