Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 51-55, June 2009

The effects of smoking on intersegmental motion in the upper thoracic spine

  • Karen M. Dishauzi, DC

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO 63017
  • ,
  • Tiffany M. Brey, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Kelly A. Lady, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Douglas W. Morris, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Tejal D. Patel, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Joseph D. Sas, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • John Zhang, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director of International Center, Associate Director for Research, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO 63017
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Logan University, 1851 Schoettler Road, Chesterfield, MO 63011, United States. Tel.: +1 636 230 1920; fax: +1 636 207 2417.

Received 26 March 2008; received in revised form 17 December 2008; accepted 18 December 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine if smoking has an effect on intersegmental motion in the upper thoracic spine.

Methods

Fifty participants (25 smokers and 25 nonsmokers) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. Both groups were scanned by the ProAdjuster (Pittsburg, PA) system 3 times for 3 days in the upper thoracic spine to determine the fixation, mobility, frequency, and motoricity of each segment.

Results

The results revealed an overall higher rate of fixation in both the smoker and nonsmoker groups at all 3 vertebral levels. However, there was a higher rate of fixation within the smoker group than the nonsmoker group (P < .05). The results showed that participants who smoked had a higher fixation rate, which is energy needed to overcome inertia in the T1 spinal region. The mobility was higher in the nonsmoking group (P < .05). Frequency and motoricity showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05).

Conclusion

According to the data that have been compiled, there is significantly greater fixation in the smoking participants at T1/T2 and T2/T3 spinal regions when compared with the nonsmoking participants, although both groups had a higher-than-normal fixation rate. The nonsmoking participants demonstrated higher mobility compared with the smoking group.

Key indexing terms: Chiropractic, Smoking

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This is a self-funded study with no conflict of interests.

PII: S1556-3707(09)00027-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.12.003

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 51-55, June 2009