Journal Home
Search for

Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 56-61 (June 2009)


View previous. 8 of 16 View next.

A pilot study to determine the effects of a supine sacroiliac orthopedic blocking procedure on cervical spine extensor isometric strength

Kristan Giggey, DCaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Rodger Tepe, PhDb

Received 26 June 2008; received in revised form 3 November 2008; accepted 25 November 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine if an orthopedic pelvic blocking procedure affects cervical spine extensor isometric strength.

Methods

Twenty-two participants were sequentially assigned into treatment and control groups. Treatment consisted of a 2-minute procedure using orthopedic blocks (padded wedges with a 45° incline) that were placed bilaterally under the ilia as determined by leg length assessment. Isometric strength measurements took place in 2 sessions with a day of rest between. The treatment group received therapy at the second session immediate to postisometric measures.

Results

Outcome measures were the pre- and posttreatment measurements of cervical isometric extension strength in pounds. The t tests showed no statistically significant difference between groups in isometric extension strength before treatment. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between groups after treatment (F1,21 = 7.174, P = .014). The treatment group demonstrated an average increase of 6.35 (8.18) lb in extensor strength.

Conclusions

The current study showed a statistically significant change in cervical isometric extensor strength after sacroiliac joint blocking.

a Research Faculty, Research Division, College of Chiropractic, Logan University

b Dean of Research, Research Division, College of Chiropractic, Logan University

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 1851 Schoettler Rd, PO Box 1065, Chesterfield, MO 63006-1065, USA. Tel.: +1 800 782 3344x1942; fax: +1 636 207 2417.

 This was an internally funded project.

PII: S1556-3707(09)00029-7

doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.11.002


View previous. 8 of 16 View next.