Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 141-145, December 2007

The effect of cervical spine manual therapy on normal mouth opening in asymptomatic subjects

  • James W. George, DC

      Affiliations

    • Research Resident, Division of Research, Logan College of Chiropractic, St Louis, MO 63006
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO 63006, USA. Tel.: +1 636 230 1947; fax: +1 636 207 2417.
  • ,
  • Jason Fennema, DC

      Affiliations

    • Senior Intern, Logan College of Chiropractic, St Louis, MO 63006
  • ,
  • Adam Maddox, DC

      Affiliations

    • Senior Intern, Logan College of Chiropractic, St Louis, MO 63006
  • ,
  • Martha Nessler, DC

      Affiliations

    • Senior Intern, Logan College of Chiropractic, St Louis, MO 63006
  • ,
  • Clayton D. Skaggs, DC

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Research, Division of Research, Logan College of Chiropractic, St Louis, MO 63006

Received 20 April 2007; received in revised form 29 June 2007; accepted 9 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

Temporomandibular disorders are a group of disorders affecting the temporomandibular joint and/or masticatory muscles. One of the signs associated with temporomandibular disorders is a reduction in mouth opening. During normal mouth opening, extension occurs at the cervical-cranial junction. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if manual therapy applied to the cervical-cranial junction would significantly improve mouth-opening capacity.

Methods

One hundred one participants were randomly assigned to either an Active Release Technique (ART) group; high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation (HVLA) group; or control group. A blinded investigator measured mouth opening using a TheraBite range of motion scale (TheraBite Corporation, West Chester, PA). Participants received ART to the suboccipitals or HVLA to the cervical spine at C1 or sat with an investigator for 3 minutes with no treatment. After the treatment session, mouth opening was remeasured. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the group mean values. The a priori α level was .05.

Results

The repeated-measures analysis of variance showed no significant difference between the ART, HVLA, and control groups' pretreatment and posttreatment measurements (F = 0.41, P > .05).

Conclusion

Manual therapy to the cervical spine did not significantly improve mouth opening in this asymptomatic population. Future trials using participants with restricted mouth-opening measures are warranted.

Key indexing terms: Musculoskeletal manipulations, Temporomandibular joint, Range of motion, Articular, Chiropractic

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0899-3467(07)00101-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcme.2007.08.001

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 141-145, December 2007